“ObamaCare Individual Mandate.” ObamaCare Individual Mandate. Since Obamacare makes it possible for impoverished people to afford healthcare by basing their premiums off of their incomes; people choosing to not have healthcare are doing so for reasons other than price. Is it ethical to require the government and the wealthy to have to pay for this? Obviously there is no win-win situation, so a compromise of beliefs is needed in order to determine how to approach healthcare. Therefore, the next step is combining the established ethical standard with a process that upholds the standard in an ethical manner, when applied to each individual in the system. While there are a number of the “universal human rights” that are not actually universal and people in many countries do not have them, it does not mean that we should not strive for them, especially in countries where we can afford to uphold these rights. This is our call and together, united, we can answer it. I find it absolutely absurd when I hear people, especially elected officials, saying, "The debate on healthcare has been too short. We live in the wealthiest nation on Earth -- the wealthiest nation in the history of the world -- and millions of our citizens can't see a doctor. I believe that access to health care is a universal human right. For those that don't realize -- a group that I hope would not include elected officials -- we have been talking about healthcare and fixing our system since the beginning of the 20th century. No more excuses, no more waiting, no more stalling, no more empty promises. Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. I find the Obamacare fine on those who do not have healthcare to be completely ethical, because these people are choosing to not allocate their money rationally. Many people are okay with Obama’s plan for universal health care. Healthcare is a right, not a privilege and it is high time that the United States of America join the rest of the civilized world in providing this basic right to all of its citizens. However, where does the ethicality lie in this? To claim that healthcare as a “right” means someone must claim a right to the services of the health-care provider. The "not enough time" argument is a smoke screen for the "we get millions of dollars in campaign contributions from insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and other industry lobbyists and we like that money" argument. If one chooses not to enroll in any healthcare plan, they must pay a small fee. I think all countries have an obligation to make sure that all 30 of the rights outlined in “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights” including the right to health and it is especially despicable when the US and other developed countries aren’t protecting these rights. I believe that access to health care is a universal human right. At the bottom of the biggest current policy debate in America, whether to increase government intervention in health care, is a moral question: Is health care a “basic human right?” Healthcare Is a Moral Right. Every major change that we have enacted took this kind of courage, witnessed this kind of resistance. Within the last decade specifically, the idea of access to healthcare has gained more and more importance, playing a critical role within the last election. The current bills in Congress may not be perfect, but they are just the beginning. However, there is one thing that makes people resistant to this “Obamacare”: the fee one must pay if they decide not to have health care. This fee makes people feel trapped into either getting health care or getting health care because they might as well spend their money on something that can personally benefit them, rather than spending it on some fee. Yet others would say that health care is a privilege. It is time for this to end, and we are very close to making that happen. N.p., n.d. Further. However, the next step is what will actually give us results. 07 Apr. I believe all health policies should echo human rights, and what those human rights actually looks like will depend on the country, development level, and circumstances. Healthcare enters the political realm because of the controversy over whether or not it is a human right. Indeed, many people would think that it is irresponsible and unwise to forgo health care because of insurance; nevertheless, people do not like to be forced to into getting health insurance. We made it easy for you to exercise your right to vote. While healthcare may be a universal ideal, a nation first needs to deal with its vulnerable populations to ensure that basic necessities are met before healthcare goals are met. Not only do I like your way of writing, but I also appreciate you properly displaying a simple yet overlooked concept, “…but the very foundation of life is health, and if millions have not the means to afford it or access it as others do, is the life of such a person unable to obtain health care any less worthy than someone who can afford and access the best medical science has to offer?” While the point of our class is to take in different perspectives and productively sift through diverse ethics, I agree that on this point we can pretty much accept along with the author, that the answer is indeed “no”. Strictly on the basis of valuing a life, stating that healthcare is a right for some not for all begs the question who has a more valuable life – whose lives do we care more about saving. As a result of an unequal system of healthcare that began during World War II, the idea of healthcare as a basic entitlement that we all contribute to—much like clean water, garbage collection, roads, etc—has experienced a complete breakdown in American cultural consciousness.. This fee takes away autonomy and feeling of freedom, and also the fee forces the individual to prioritize healthcare above other things. Health access is also tied to employers’ control of employees’ health care under the ACA. Right to health denied. The "not enough time" argument is just a smoke screen for the "we are not interested in doing this" argument, which opponents of healthcare reform are too afraid to say out loud. Go to the Health Care for America Now website and join now! Fees actually inhibit the responsible use of health care by putting up barriers to access care. Other major legislation, like the Civil Rights Act and the Clean Air Act, all had amendments added in the months and years after their initial passing. Now is the time to risk more, speak louder and take bold action; those who are against this reform are making their case and we must counter them with force and conviction. Because the people no longer have a choice (or at least an illusion of a choice) many feel that they should resist the system in order to maintain their right to choose, even if they would choose to get health care under pressure-free circumstances. This is a moral outrage, a moral disgrace and a moral ineptitude that is no longer tolerable. There is a right to health care, the argument goes, but no one has a right to make poor decisions and expect others to bear the costs. Over the past hundred years, the field of healthcare has undergone immense scrutiny as once black and white lenses have been introduced to various shades of grey. present here at this website, thanks admin of this webb site. Then from there, those are the most vulnerable and have the least access to basic care should be provided with a system where they pay the least to receive care. Many believe that the Obamacare makes a respectable effort to ensure that buying healthcare is not mandatory for everyone (another ethical issue), by allowing people to forgo any healthcare plan at the cost of a small fee. 05/10/2010 05:12 am ET Updated May 25, ... harder" argument that perpetuates a horrible trend in America that the wealthy dictate what the rest of the country has access to. Spiritual Leader, Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center, Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter. Cost is not the only way in which our system renders the right to health null and void. A huge amount of money is given to cover the health care of those who can not afford it themselves. Thus, Obamacare fits this model to a certain extent, but my human rights issue with Obamacare mirrors that of my peers.