Engineers and scientists are quite comfortable working within the To what extent have I analyzed the beliefs I hold which may impede my ability to think critically? context for that segment or course. What market/economic/competitive environment is assumed? Critical Thinking Exercise 1: Tour Guide for an Alien This exercise provides an opportunity to think outside your normal way of thinking. pursuit of such virtue. Are divergent views given due consideration? to answer?" "When Have terms and symbols been clearly defined? Have interactions with other systems been fully considered? What information do we lack? Paul's model is briefly described and exemplified by questions engineers ask in practice. Once students What maturity level or maturation timeline is assumed for emerging technologies? �ˀ��e�:�IZ�����$&�����Ae=R�At�_�D~G1�o���> 8}�o�~� �rDZ�k�(�V��3�����S�q� vocabulary. approach?" 149 0 obj
<>stream
What is the set of viable candidate solutions? Have other points of view been considered (stock holders, manufacturing, sales, customers, public citizens, community interests, etc.)? Have the assumptions been clearly stated? A topic as large as an entire course or as small as an editorial in the created themselves. (recognizing the team manager may be the subject of either positive or traits exhibited in a way that benefited the team, and a second example This paper describes classroom exercises employing the model which are suitable for undergraduate and graduate engineering program. Paul's model is briefly described and exemplified by questions engineers ask in practice. Have the environmental/safety impacts been appropriately weighed? both successes and failures in engineering in our critical thinking marketing/sales? as part of technical debrief. This paper introduces this Thinkers' Guide as a tool for Opportunities endstream
endobj
134 0 obj
<>
endobj
135 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
136 0 obj
<>stream
regulators? insight and integrity, regardless of the subject. The faculty member is indispensable in keeping the elements close of both excellent and deficit engineering reasoning. The engineering Figure 1: Richard Paul's Critical Thinking Model. is modelling the thinking of mature engineers through the questions Several examples are provided of both excellence and disaster in engineering In doing so, the professor Are there hidden or unstated assumptions which should be challenged? Have features and capabilities (and hence cost) been included which the customer neither needs nor wants? What was the Here we apply a model to the way in which What environmental or operating conditions are assumed? A design and manufacturing point of view is typically presumed-What These exercises are designed to help develop critical thinking skills. Richard Paul's critical thinking model was adapted to the challenge of engineering education, and published in July 2006 as a guide to Engineering Reasoning. A new thinkers' Am I giving dissenting opinions adequate consideration? experimental? Vignettes in the back of the guide are intended to illustrate The was brought to bear? Are there unnecessary details obscuring the dominant factors? Consequently, introducing the standards and using textbook chapter or technical report using this framework. enterprise does however pose distinct questions for the engineer in on the quality of thought. way for the students to become comfortable working with the elements is "What's the source of this insight? means of reciprocal teaching. The guide follows Paul's model, providing a framework for analyzing and %%EOF
component Do I accurately represent viewpoints with which I disagree? identifying a vignette in which an individual or team deficit in the Do I adhere to technical principles and evidence when persuading others of my position or do I distort matters to support my position? abound for using the eight elements both in class and outside course-work. result?". Using the Engineering Reasoning guide, Was it theoretical or How/when? Am I quick to admit when I'm in domains beyond my expertise? The standards provide a ready vocabulary for identifying the weaknesses negative vignettes). them to foster development, is most effectively done in the context of Do drawings/graphs/photos and supporting annotations clearly portray important relationships? What was the purpose of Are there disposal, or environmental issues? We employ thermodynamic models, electrical we think, an architecture whose purpose is aiding the analysis and To what extent do I expect of myself what I expect of others? The faculty member or team as members of teams. At the conclusion of team projects, or coincident with major milestones reasoning. representative questions from the guide, as well as an example they've What were the implications of the material you learned?" Are vested interests inappropriately influencing the design? interaction in which the questions posed by professor apply to one of e.g.- "Identify the eight elements associated with the class you What if the environment is other than we had expected (e.g.- hotter, colder, dusty, humid)? Why this works: This not only expands your … assigned standard to their partner, including both examples of Hint: be the one who has the critical thinking skills. evaluate the thinking present in these episodes. community affairs? What available or emerging technologies are appropriate? h�mk�0ǿ�^���gɂH�vu�ݖd�@��h�!�C����N���c���^�;I���g�$a�+Ex��jb�
��%���D''t��Ǫ%�ZzZl.b��+��$v'�5=_ˆ#�5�������Zgd !�`�:���rO����ul���i�.�����^-��4o�Uy?���H��q}C2F�ML!0�m�i��p���&��QO��l�@���\õw�Eܖ��(_@ue�;�Ӹ,�v�;-�xLg��*��x6b�y�6�\�_��[(��g�Age*y�p�b�pX��Q �����h��2p�5�p��|2�3ΣFo� ��8��yt
g�Z�>���@.�҅��,h�ˠ��C�,ŷ�+%�hR:V{�a����g��e���v"3���È��.40г�^��[>�x�*6��?V%�"��R��2��v�e��8����|^�? Paul, R.W., Niewoehner, R.J., and Elder, L.. What conclusions were formed? “Thinking is skilled work. subject area. What product/process will best satisfy the customer's performance, cost and schedule requirements? What empirical support do we have for this theoretical that personal virtues relate to their success as engineers. environmentalists? (long duration projects), team members can be assigned to write a paragraph "What implications follow from this development?" assigned to skim their new text's Table of Contents and decompose the new They determine the extent to which we think with On technical reports, Am I open to consider novel approaches to this problem, and willing to learn and study where warranted?