Though the R84 and R92 cut similar silhouettes, each microphone has … Turn the front of the mic towards the source to achieve a more crisp, bright sound and turn the back to the source for a darker, smoother sound that tames harsh high frequencies. If you’re recording an orchestral ensemble and you want to incorporate room ambience, reach for the R84. Sensitivity of the R84 is -52dBV/Pa, and unlike its big (and much heavier) brother, the R44, the R84exhibits an impressive frequency response that gets up to 20 kHz(±3 dB). Another interesting thing I heard was that even though the R84 sounds muddy in comparison on most of the clips, the low end is much more rounded and not as harsh as the R92. The choice between ribbon microphones can depend on the size of a space or the available distance between instruments when tracking live. ... a ribbon mic of the calibre of the AEA R92 is highly recommended. Ribbon Mics... r84 vs. r92 vs. r-121 on overheads and gutiars. ©2020 AEA Ribbon Mics & Preamps, All Rights Reserved, proximity effect can boost the low-end frequencies. I think it sounds basically flat, at least to my ear, when you get about 15-18" away. The R84’s proximity effect can boost the low-end frequencies of any source within 18 inches of its position. The AEA R92 was designed with reduced proxmity effect, enabling it to … Understanding the distinct qualities of each microphone is essential when it comes to deciding which of the two will best serve the instrument you are recording. Similar in sound to the AEA R84, but with a more pronounced midrange and minimized proximity effect, the R92 performs brilliantly when up close to brass, guitar amps, kick drum, and percussion. If you want to capture a full sound of those drums in the room, try using the R84 as a front-of-kit mic. i've been reading the … AEA R92 -vs- R84? The proximity effect of the R92 is present when the mic is within 6 inches of the source. The AEA R84 is sort of a lightweight R44, with the same long-geometry ribbon but a different magnet structure. The R84 in particular has already developed a solid reputation, which has seen the mic grow rapidly into a virtual industry standard. When recording drums, cymbals can produce harsh high frequencies that would benefit from the smoothness of the rear-side of an R92. AEA's popular R84, on the other hand, has its flattest response much closer to the source-in the 2 ft range. The third and latest microphone to be added to the company’s small but well-credentialed inventory is the R92. i'm looking for a ribbon that would work well on both acoustic and electric guitars, as well as female vocals and OH/Room mic. AEA's popular R84, on the other hand, has its flattest response much closer to the source-in the 2 ft range. Hey there! (I'll certainly have to check it out sometime, though, now that you've brought it to our attention...). Again, all the clips were of the mic placed close to the sound source. The R92 was the first near-field microphone we developed, and its optimal recording distance is anywhere between 1 and 18 inches from the source. Offering a classic ribbon character in the form of a near-field, the dual-tone R92 functions as a versatile creative tool with innumerable possibilities. Front End Audio | Your Ultimate Pro Audio Dealer | 888-228-4530. Though both the R84 and R92 are versatile enough to record just about anything, one might wonder which of the two will serve them best in their specific environment. I spoke to someone and they felt the Royer more sturdy for the job. What makes each of AEA’s pill-shaped ribbon microphones unique? The new R92 employs AEA's Large Ribbon Geometry design, like the R84, but this new model has been optimised specifically for close-miking applications. A feature of the R92 that distinguishes it from any other AEA mic is a ‘dual-tone’ functionality that results in two distinct sounds from the front and back of the mic respectively. The R92 has a tonality similar to that of the R84, as they both exhibit a classic Big Ribbon sound, but the R92 has uniquely pronounced mid-range response as well as minimized proximity effect. Post by Recycled_Brains » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:27 pm i'm currently exploring some ribbon mic options and am wondering if anyone could offer any experience related info./comparisons between these the R92 and R84 models. I was kind of dumbfounded at my choice for a minute until I started to recall a lot of discussions I had seen on the forum and a conversation with the guys over at Mercenary Audio. The R84 is just a great example of a classic ribbon mic sound, engineers beware of boominess. I was able to download the files without incident, including not getting sent to Fling.com. No problem! Just a friendly reminder that political discussion, (including "offhand" and 'sideways' commenting) is. If you need a close mic on a guitar amp, try an R92. There is a place and purpose for each of these microphones. The R84 delivers the classic sound of the 44 in a more compact, lightweight body. I'm having trouble deciding on a pair of matched ribbons. This is in a studio where the most powerful amp is a 50 watt Marshall Stack. AEA R92 -vs- R84? Like its forbearer, the R84 provides generous warmth and richness of tone, but with more extended top-end. I've been reading a lot of threads on these three in particular, and while I had originally settled on a matched pair of Royer R-121s, I'm not so sure anymore. AEA’s slick, retro-looking R84 ($1,000) is the newest mic indesigner Wes Dooley’s product line. AEA’s popular R84, on the other hand, has its flattest response much closer to the source — in the two-foot range. Most vintage ribbon microphones are spectrally balanced for medium and distant placements, principally because their inherently large proximity effect precludes close miking.